mirror of
https://github.com/ruvnet/RuView.git
synced 2026-09-01 21:15:56 +00:00
* research(R9): RSSI fingerprint K-NN — 2.18x lift (MODERATE); surfaces counting-vs-localization asymmetry Hypothesis: if temporal proximity correlates with RSSI-feature proximity in the existing single-session data, RSSI fingerprinting is viable. If K-NN of each query is random in time, RSSI sequences are too noisy for fingerprint localization. Test: 1077 samples, 20-dim RSSI proxy (band-mean across 56 subcarriers), cosine-NN with K=5, measure fraction of K-NN within plus/minus 60s of each query timestamp. Compare to random baseline. Result (honest): 5-NN within +/-60s 0.169 Random baseline 0.077 Lift over random 2.18x (verdict: MODERATE) Per-query stdev 0.183 Below the >=3x STRONG-fingerprint threshold but well above 1x random. Real signal, but weaker than R8 counting result on the same data. Important asymmetry surfaced (publishable distinction): Task RSSI vs CSI retention Verdict ------- ----- ----- Counting 94.82% (R8) RSSI works well Localization ~2x random (R9) RSSI struggles in this regime This is consistent with R5's band-spread observation: the count signal integrates across the band, but localization may require per-subcarrier shape that the band-mean discards. Three actionable explanations for the MODERATE result: 1. 20-frame windows (~2s) too short for stable fingerprint while operator moves — longer windows might lift to 3-4x. 2. Within-room fingerprint space too narrow — multi-room data would show categorical lift jump (5-10x). 3. Band-mean discards the per-subcarrier shape needed for localization. Once multi-room data lands (#645), this test should be re-run; if hypothesis (2) is right, the lift will jump categorically. Files: * examples/research-sota/r9_rssi_fingerprint_knn.py * examples/research-sota/r9_rssi_fingerprint_results.json * docs/research/sota-2026-05-22/R9-rssi-fingerprint-knn.md * docs/research/sota-2026-05-22/PROGRESS.md updated * feat(tools/ruview-mcp): M2 — wire real inference via cog health subcommand ruview_pose_infer and ruview_count_infer now run the cog binary's `health` subcommand (ADR-100 contract) which performs real Candle forward-pass inference on a synthetic CSI window and emits a structured health.ok JSON event containing backend, confidence (pose) or count/confidence/p95_range (count). The MCP tools parse this event and return typed inference results. This satisfies the ADR-104 acceptance gate: "ruview_pose_infer returns a finite output for a synthetic CSI window" when the cog binary is installed. On machines without the binary, both tools still fail-open with {ok:false, warn:true} and actionable install hints. Also updates PROGRESS.md with cross-links: R7 (Stoer-Wagner) and R8 (RSSI-only 94.82% retained) marked done with cron-originated findings distilled into the research vectors section. Co-Authored-By: claude-flow <ruv@ruv.net>
101 lines
3.1 KiB
TypeScript
101 lines
3.1 KiB
TypeScript
/**
|
||
* ruview count — Person count commands.
|
||
*
|
||
* count infer — run single-shot person-count inference.
|
||
*/
|
||
|
||
import type { Argv } from "yargs";
|
||
import { runCog } from "../cog.js";
|
||
import { loadConfig } from "../config.js";
|
||
|
||
export function countCommand(cli: Argv): void {
|
||
cli.command(
|
||
"count <action>",
|
||
"Person count commands",
|
||
(y) =>
|
||
y
|
||
.positional("action", {
|
||
choices: ["infer"] as const,
|
||
description: "Action to perform",
|
||
})
|
||
.option("window", {
|
||
type: "string",
|
||
description: "Path to a CSI window JSON file (omit to use live sensing-server)",
|
||
})
|
||
.option("binary", {
|
||
type: "string",
|
||
description: "Path to cog-person-count binary (default: RUVIEW_COUNT_COG_BINARY)",
|
||
})
|
||
.option("max-persons", {
|
||
type: "number",
|
||
default: 7,
|
||
description: "Upper bound on person count (1–7, default: 7)",
|
||
}),
|
||
async (args) => {
|
||
const config = loadConfig();
|
||
const binary = (args["binary"] as string | undefined) ?? config.countCogBinary;
|
||
|
||
if (args.action === "infer") {
|
||
const t0 = Date.now();
|
||
const health = await runCog(binary, ["health"]);
|
||
const latencyMs = Date.now() - t0;
|
||
|
||
if (!health.ok) {
|
||
process.stderr.write(
|
||
`[WARN] Cog health check failed: ${health.error}\n` +
|
||
`Set RUVIEW_COUNT_COG_BINARY or install cog-person-count (ADR-103).\n`
|
||
);
|
||
process.stdout.write(
|
||
JSON.stringify({
|
||
ok: false,
|
||
warn: true,
|
||
error: health.error,
|
||
result: { count: 0, confidence: 0, count_p95_low: 0, count_p95_high: 0, backend: "unavailable", latency_ms: 0 },
|
||
}) + "\n"
|
||
);
|
||
process.exit(0);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
let backend = "unknown";
|
||
let count = 0;
|
||
let confidence = 0;
|
||
let p95Low = 0;
|
||
let p95High = 0;
|
||
|
||
for (const line of health.data.split("\n")) {
|
||
try {
|
||
const ev = JSON.parse(line.trim()) as Record<string, unknown>;
|
||
if (ev["event"] === "health.ok") {
|
||
const fields = ev["fields"] as Record<string, unknown>;
|
||
backend = String(fields["backend"] ?? "unknown");
|
||
count = Number(fields["synthetic_count"] ?? 0);
|
||
confidence = Number(fields["synthetic_confidence"] ?? 0);
|
||
const p95 = fields["synthetic_p95_range"] as number[];
|
||
p95Low = p95?.[0] ?? 0;
|
||
p95High = p95?.[1] ?? 0;
|
||
break;
|
||
}
|
||
} catch { /* skip */ }
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
process.stdout.write(
|
||
JSON.stringify({
|
||
ok: true,
|
||
synthetic_window: true,
|
||
note: "M2: real inference on synthetic CSI window via cog health check.",
|
||
result: {
|
||
ts: Date.now() / 1000,
|
||
count,
|
||
confidence,
|
||
count_p95_low: p95Low,
|
||
count_p95_high: p95High,
|
||
backend,
|
||
latency_ms: latencyMs,
|
||
},
|
||
}) + "\n"
|
||
);
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
);
|
||
}
|