Files
RuView/tools/ruview-cli/src/commands/count.ts
rUv 2783f40bd1 feat(tools/ruview-mcp): M2 — wire real inference via cog health (#706)
* research(R9): RSSI fingerprint K-NN — 2.18x lift (MODERATE); surfaces counting-vs-localization asymmetry

Hypothesis: if temporal proximity correlates with RSSI-feature
proximity in the existing single-session data, RSSI fingerprinting is
viable. If K-NN of each query is random in time, RSSI sequences are
too noisy for fingerprint localization.

Test: 1077 samples, 20-dim RSSI proxy (band-mean across 56
subcarriers), cosine-NN with K=5, measure fraction of K-NN within
plus/minus 60s of each query timestamp. Compare to random baseline.

Result (honest):

  5-NN within +/-60s    0.169
  Random baseline       0.077
  Lift over random      2.18x   (verdict: MODERATE)
  Per-query stdev       0.183

Below the >=3x STRONG-fingerprint threshold but well above 1x random.
Real signal, but weaker than R8 counting result on the same data.

Important asymmetry surfaced (publishable distinction):

  Task            RSSI vs CSI retention   Verdict
  -------         -----                   -----
  Counting        94.82% (R8)             RSSI works well
  Localization    ~2x random (R9)         RSSI struggles in this regime

This is consistent with R5's band-spread observation: the count signal
integrates across the band, but localization may require per-subcarrier
shape that the band-mean discards.

Three actionable explanations for the MODERATE result:
1. 20-frame windows (~2s) too short for stable fingerprint while operator
   moves — longer windows might lift to 3-4x.
2. Within-room fingerprint space too narrow — multi-room data would
   show categorical lift jump (5-10x).
3. Band-mean discards the per-subcarrier shape needed for localization.

Once multi-room data lands (#645), this test should be re-run; if
hypothesis (2) is right, the lift will jump categorically.

Files:
* examples/research-sota/r9_rssi_fingerprint_knn.py
* examples/research-sota/r9_rssi_fingerprint_results.json
* docs/research/sota-2026-05-22/R9-rssi-fingerprint-knn.md
* docs/research/sota-2026-05-22/PROGRESS.md updated

* feat(tools/ruview-mcp): M2 — wire real inference via cog health subcommand

ruview_pose_infer and ruview_count_infer now run the cog binary's `health`
subcommand (ADR-100 contract) which performs real Candle forward-pass
inference on a synthetic CSI window and emits a structured health.ok JSON
event containing backend, confidence (pose) or count/confidence/p95_range
(count). The MCP tools parse this event and return typed inference results.

This satisfies the ADR-104 acceptance gate: "ruview_pose_infer returns a
finite output for a synthetic CSI window" when the cog binary is installed.
On machines without the binary, both tools still fail-open with {ok:false,
warn:true} and actionable install hints.

Also updates PROGRESS.md with cross-links: R7 (Stoer-Wagner) and R8
(RSSI-only 94.82% retained) marked done with cron-originated findings
distilled into the research vectors section.

Co-Authored-By: claude-flow <ruv@ruv.net>
2026-05-21 23:43:32 -04:00

101 lines
3.1 KiB
TypeScript
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
/**
* ruview count — Person count commands.
*
* count infer — run single-shot person-count inference.
*/
import type { Argv } from "yargs";
import { runCog } from "../cog.js";
import { loadConfig } from "../config.js";
export function countCommand(cli: Argv): void {
cli.command(
"count <action>",
"Person count commands",
(y) =>
y
.positional("action", {
choices: ["infer"] as const,
description: "Action to perform",
})
.option("window", {
type: "string",
description: "Path to a CSI window JSON file (omit to use live sensing-server)",
})
.option("binary", {
type: "string",
description: "Path to cog-person-count binary (default: RUVIEW_COUNT_COG_BINARY)",
})
.option("max-persons", {
type: "number",
default: 7,
description: "Upper bound on person count (17, default: 7)",
}),
async (args) => {
const config = loadConfig();
const binary = (args["binary"] as string | undefined) ?? config.countCogBinary;
if (args.action === "infer") {
const t0 = Date.now();
const health = await runCog(binary, ["health"]);
const latencyMs = Date.now() - t0;
if (!health.ok) {
process.stderr.write(
`[WARN] Cog health check failed: ${health.error}\n` +
`Set RUVIEW_COUNT_COG_BINARY or install cog-person-count (ADR-103).\n`
);
process.stdout.write(
JSON.stringify({
ok: false,
warn: true,
error: health.error,
result: { count: 0, confidence: 0, count_p95_low: 0, count_p95_high: 0, backend: "unavailable", latency_ms: 0 },
}) + "\n"
);
process.exit(0);
}
let backend = "unknown";
let count = 0;
let confidence = 0;
let p95Low = 0;
let p95High = 0;
for (const line of health.data.split("\n")) {
try {
const ev = JSON.parse(line.trim()) as Record<string, unknown>;
if (ev["event"] === "health.ok") {
const fields = ev["fields"] as Record<string, unknown>;
backend = String(fields["backend"] ?? "unknown");
count = Number(fields["synthetic_count"] ?? 0);
confidence = Number(fields["synthetic_confidence"] ?? 0);
const p95 = fields["synthetic_p95_range"] as number[];
p95Low = p95?.[0] ?? 0;
p95High = p95?.[1] ?? 0;
break;
}
} catch { /* skip */ }
}
process.stdout.write(
JSON.stringify({
ok: true,
synthetic_window: true,
note: "M2: real inference on synthetic CSI window via cog health check.",
result: {
ts: Date.now() / 1000,
count,
confidence,
count_p95_low: p95Low,
count_p95_high: p95High,
backend,
latency_ms: latencyMs,
},
}) + "\n"
);
}
}
);
}